Michael Gordin konzentriert sich auf die Geschichte der modernen Wissenschaft und erforscht deren gesellschaftliche Auswirkungen. Seine Arbeit befasst sich häufig mit dem Zusammenspiel von wissenschaftlichen Entdeckungen, politischen Landschaften und sozialen Ideologien und enthüllt die komplexen Wege, auf denen Wissen unsere Welt prägt. Gordin analysiert historische Ereignisse und intellektuelle Strömungen mit Schwerpunkt auf ihren langfristigen Folgen und dem Zusammenspiel verschiedener Bereiche menschlichen Verständnisses. Sein Ansatz bietet den Lesern tiefe Einblicke in entscheidende Momente des wissenschaftlichen Fortschritts und deren breiteren kulturellen Kontext.
Many people would be able to agree on a list of things that fall under the umbrella of pseudoscience--astrology, phrenology, UFOlogy, creationism, and eugenics might come to mind. But defining what makes these fields "pseudo" and differentiates them from genuine science is a far more complex issue. Michael D. Gordin provides a historical tour through various theories, guiding readers along a bewildering array of marginalized doctrines, focusing on some of the central debates about what science is and is not, and how such controversies have shifted over the centuries--back cover.
Many people would be able to agree on a list of things that fall under the umbrella of pseudoscience - astrology, phrenology, UFOlogy, creationism, and eugenics might come to mind. But defining what makes these fields "pseudo" and differentiates them from genuine science is a far more complex issue. On the Fringe explores the philosophical and historical attempts to address this problem of demarcation. Michael D. Gordin guides readers along a bewildering array of marginalized doctrines, focusing on some of the central debates about what science is and is not, and how such controversies have shifted over the centuries. On the Fringe provides a historical tour through various theories, providing readers with the tools to think deeply about scientific controversies both past and present.
Though one of the most significant figures in modern science, Einstein often occupied a marginal position. Despite his role in developing quantum theory, he remained skeptical of it, and his major research goal at Princeton—a unified field theory—ultimately failed. Michael Gordin delves into this paradox by focusing on a brief yet pivotal period in Einstein's life: his time as a physics professor in Prague from April 1911 to summer 1912. Often overlooked by biographers, this year was crucial for Einstein personally and scientifically. During this time, his marriage deteriorated, he began to confront his Jewish identity, and he attempted a new explanation for gravitation that, despite its failure, influenced his later work. He also met key figures such as Max Brod, Hugo Bergmann, Philipp Frank, and Arnošt Kolman, who would shape his thinking. This exploration serves as a double-biography of Einstein and Prague, linking the two in their shared paradox of being both central and marginal to European history. While Prague would become the capital of the Czech Republic, it was often overshadowed by Vienna and Budapest within the Habsburg Empire. The city boasted a vibrant Germanophone intellectual scene, despite the majority of its population speaking Czech. By highlighting the marginality and centrality of both Einstein and Prague, Gordin offers fresh insights into Einstein's life and the intellectual climate of early twentieth-ce
