Das Buch ist derzeit nicht auf Lagerdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddf5d/ddf5d302858f46cb73a444e688a2dd1e74f002c2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddf5d/ddf5d302858f46cb73a444e688a2dd1e74f002c2" alt=""
Parameter
- Seitenzahl
- 382 Seiten
- Lesezeit
- 14 Stunden
Mehr zum Buch
Challenging conventional wisdom, this book critically examines the impact of government funding on scientific advancement and economic growth. Through historical analysis and international comparisons, Terence Kealey argues that state-sponsored science does not necessarily lead to prosperity, citing examples like Japan's economic success despite minimal government investment in science. Instead, he advocates for a free market approach as the more effective catalyst for innovation and scientific progress, prompting readers to reconsider widely held beliefs about science funding.
Buchkauf
The Economic Laws of Scientific Research, Terence Kealey, Kenneth A. Loparo
- Sprache
- Erscheinungsdatum
- 1996
- product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
- (Paperback)
Wir benachrichtigen dich per E-Mail.
Lieferung
Zahlungsmethoden
Feedback senden
- Titel
- The Economic Laws of Scientific Research
- Sprache
- Englisch
- Autor*innen
- Terence Kealey, Kenneth A. Loparo
- Verlag
- St. Martins Press-3PL
- Erscheinungsdatum
- 1996
- Einband
- Paperback
- Seitenzahl
- 382
- ISBN13
- 9780333657553
- Kategorie
- Wirtschaft, Naturwissenschaften, Politikwissenschaft
- Beschreibung
- Challenging conventional wisdom, this book critically examines the impact of government funding on scientific advancement and economic growth. Through historical analysis and international comparisons, Terence Kealey argues that state-sponsored science does not necessarily lead to prosperity, citing examples like Japan's economic success despite minimal government investment in science. Instead, he advocates for a free market approach as the more effective catalyst for innovation and scientific progress, prompting readers to reconsider widely held beliefs about science funding.