Preconditions for Contingency Fee Agreements in Australia and Germany

Mehr zum Buch

The essay explores the benefits of comparative law in shaping effective preconditions for contingency fee agreements, focusing on Australia and Germany. It critically analyzes the current legal frameworks in both countries, emphasizing the necessity of providing clients with adequate information before entering such agreements. The author suggests that the exclusion of criminal and family law from these agreements is unwarranted and advocates for legislative changes in Australia. Additionally, it recommends that Germany adopt a cooling-off period similar to Australia’s to enhance client protection.