data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddf5d/ddf5d302858f46cb73a444e688a2dd1e74f002c2" alt=""
Parameter
Kategorien
Mehr zum Buch
In discussion with Martin Buber, Franz Rosenzweig, Abraham Joshua Heschel, Franz Fischer and Emmanuel Levinas, Ephraim Meir outlines a novel conception of a selfhood that is grounded in dialogical thought. He focuses on the shaping of identity in present day societies and offers a new view on identity around the concepts of self-transcendence, self-difference, and trans-difference. Subjectivity is seen as the concrete possibility of relating to an open identity, which receives and hosts alterity. Self-difference is the crown upon the I; it is the result of a dialogical life, a life of passing to the other. The religious I is perceived as in dialogue with secularity, with its own past and with other persons. It is suggested that with a dialogical approach one may discover what unites people in pluralist societies.
Buchkauf
Dialogical thought and identity, Ephraim Meir
- Sprache
- Erscheinungsdatum
- 2013
Lieferung
Zahlungsmethoden
Feedback senden
- Titel
- Dialogical thought and identity
- Untertitel
- Trans-Different Religiosity in Present Day Societies
- Sprache
- Englisch
- Autor*innen
- Ephraim Meir
- Verlag
- Magnes
- Erscheinungsdatum
- 2013
- ISBN10
- 3110338319
- ISBN13
- 9783110338317
- Kategorie
- Psychologie
- Beschreibung
- In discussion with Martin Buber, Franz Rosenzweig, Abraham Joshua Heschel, Franz Fischer and Emmanuel Levinas, Ephraim Meir outlines a novel conception of a selfhood that is grounded in dialogical thought. He focuses on the shaping of identity in present day societies and offers a new view on identity around the concepts of self-transcendence, self-difference, and trans-difference. Subjectivity is seen as the concrete possibility of relating to an open identity, which receives and hosts alterity. Self-difference is the crown upon the I; it is the result of a dialogical life, a life of passing to the other. The religious I is perceived as in dialogue with secularity, with its own past and with other persons. It is suggested that with a dialogical approach one may discover what unites people in pluralist societies.