Gratis Versand ab € 16,99. Mehr Infos.
Bookbot

Buchbewertung

Mehr zum Buch

Anger looms large in our public lives. Should it?Reflecting on two millennia of debates about the value of anger, Agnes Callard contends that efforts to distinguish righteous forms of anger from unjust vengeance, or appropriate responses to wrongdoing from inappropriate ones, are misguided. What if, she asks, anger is not a bug of human life, but a feature—an emotion that, for all its troubling qualities, is an essential part of being a moral agent in an imperfect world? And if anger is both troubling and essential, what then do we do with the implications: that angry victims of injustice are themselves morally compromised, and that it might not be possible to respond rightly to being treated wrongly? As Callard concludes, “We can’t be good in a bad world.”The contributions that follow explore anger in its many forms—public and private, personal and political—raising an issue that we must grapple with: Does the vast well of public anger compromise us all?

Buchkauf

Boston Review Forum: On Anger, Agnes Callard, Paul Bloom, Judith Butler, Myisha Cherry, Martha Nussbaum

Sprache
Erscheinungsdatum
2020
product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
(Paperback)
Wir benachrichtigen dich per E-Mail.

Lieferung

  • Gratis Versand ab 16,99 € in ganz Österreich! Mehr Infos.

Zahlungsmethoden

3,7
Sehr gut
22 Bewertung

Hier könnte deine Bewertung stehen.

Titel
Boston Review Forum: On Anger
Sprache
Englisch
Erscheinungsdatum
2020
Einband
Paperback
Seitenzahl
160
ISBN10
1946511544
ISBN13
9781946511546
Reihe
Bewertung
3,7 von 5 Sternen
Beschreibung
Anger looms large in our public lives. Should it?Reflecting on two millennia of debates about the value of anger, Agnes Callard contends that efforts to distinguish righteous forms of anger from unjust vengeance, or appropriate responses to wrongdoing from inappropriate ones, are misguided. What if, she asks, anger is not a bug of human life, but a feature—an emotion that, for all its troubling qualities, is an essential part of being a moral agent in an imperfect world? And if anger is both troubling and essential, what then do we do with the implications: that angry victims of injustice are themselves morally compromised, and that it might not be possible to respond rightly to being treated wrongly? As Callard concludes, “We can’t be good in a bad world.”The contributions that follow explore anger in its many forms—public and private, personal and political—raising an issue that we must grapple with: Does the vast well of public anger compromise us all?