Ermanno Bencivenga Bücher

Dieses Buch bietet eine elementare, in sich geschlossene Einführung in die analytische Sprachphilosophie anhand einer systematischen und chronologischen Behandlung der Referenzproblematik: Welche Rollen spielen die singulären Terme (vor allem Eigennamen und Kennzeichnungen) in natürlichen Sprachen? Es werden die Lösungsversuche Meinongs, Freges, Russells, Carnaps, Strawsons, Donnellans und Kripkes rekonstruiert und miteinander verglichen. Jeder der Beiträge dieser bedeutenden analytischen Philosophen wird unter drei Gesichtspunkten betrachtet. Erstens: Was leistet er zur Lösung des Problems der leeren Referenz? (Was z. B. bedeutet ein singulärer Term wie «Pegasus», der nichts zu bezeichnen scheint?) Zweitens: Was leistet er zur Lösung des Problems des ausgeschlossenen Dritten? (Ist z. B. ein Satz wie «Pegasus ist weiss oder Pegasus ist nicht weiss», der gemäss dem Gesetz vom ausgeschlossenen Dritten logisch wahr sein müsste, in Wirklichkeit falsch?) Drittens: Was leistet er zur Lösung des Problems der indirekten Kontexte?

In this exploration of Kant's legacy for contemporary thought, Ermanno Bencivenga, a creative and iconoclastic figure in American philosophy, seeks to liberate Kant's work from the constraints of the analytic tradition. He offers a defamiliarizing interpretation of Kantianism, portraying Kant as a master thinker whose focus on judgment lays the groundwork for a new philosophical practice centered on learning. Bencivenga's work encompasses a range of topics, from the electronic self to a sharp critique of Richard Rorty's postmodern thought, resulting in a captivating blend of styles and genres. With a plucky, sometimes irritating, and wickedly humorous tone, the book highlights the mediocrity and false piety often found in contemporary professional philosophy. Through intensely personal essays, Bencivenga emphasizes the significance of philosophy in our lives, reminding readers of its enduring relevance and impact.

Exploring Montaigne's philosophical insights, Ermanno Bencivenga critiques the Cartesian notion of self-consciousness as a foundational source of knowledge. He argues that the self should be viewed as a continuously constructed project, emphasizing that true understanding requires practical effort and ongoing training. Montaigne's assertion that he is the subject of his own work illustrates this concept, highlighting the need for a revolutionary and playful approach to self-constitution, which contrasts sharply with the static nature of traditional self-perception.

This book revitalizes bold and imaginative theorizing in philosophy, challenging the trend of destruction and deconstruction within the field. It explores diverse topics like quantum mechanics, political theory, and psychoanalysis, presenting a creative collection of ideas rather than a systematic framework, offering a refreshing perspective on philosophical discourse.

This clear, accessible account of Hegelian logic makes a case for its enormous seductiveness, its surprising presence in the collective consciousness, and the dangers associated therewith. Offering comprehensive coverage of Hegel's important works, Bencivenga avoids getting bogged down in short-lived scholarly debates to provide a work of permanent significance and usefulness.

Exploring the issues ranging from feminism to metaphysics, from the philosophy of science to aesthetics, as well as the intrinsically dialogic nature of philosophical activity itself, the author endeavors to be true to the nature of philosophical practice.

Exploring the concept of identity, the author examines how individuals can embody both singularity and multiplicity, likening this to a dancer's disciplined movement through space. The book delves into the complexities of this ontological duality, addressing personal, communal, and political dimensions. Through this lens, it seeks to unravel the intricate layers of existence and the interconnectedness of self and society.

This book explores the nature of meaningful discourse through three theories of logos: analytic, dialectical, and oceanic. The author contrasts and assesses these theories, addressing their parameters and historical context. It culminates a four-decade scholarly journey, offering deep insights into logic and philosophy.