Parameter
- 192 Seiten
- 7 Lesestunden
Mehr zum Buch
The internationally bestselling guide to better thinking used by tens of thousands of people - fully revised and updated. The need for the Six Hats is based on an understanding of how the brain chemicals change with the mode of thinking. Using this method one major corporation reduced the time taken for multinational project discussions from thirty days to just two days. Argument is inefficient, ineffective and extremely slow. Argument was never designed to be constructive. The parallel thinking of the six hats is rapidly replacing argument around the world. For two-thousand-four-hundred years we have been content with argument which was never designed to be constructive. Discovering 'what is' may not be the same as designing 'what can be'.
Buchkauf
Six Thinking Hats, Edward de Bono
- Sprache
- Erscheinungsdatum
- 1999
- product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
- (Paperback)
Hier könnte deine Bewertung stehen.
- Titel
- Six Thinking Hats
- Sprache
- Englisch
- Autor*innen
- Edward de Bono
- Erscheinungsdatum
- 1999
- Einband
- Paperback
- Seitenzahl
- 192
- ISBN10
- 0140296662
- ISBN13
- 9780140296662
- Reihe
- Schlagwörter
- Sachbücher, Handel, Wirtschaft & Management, Lebenshilfe, Psychologische Thematik, Persönliche Entwicklung, Management & Personalverwaltung, Führung, Denken
- Erstveröffentlichung
- 1985
- Originaltitel
- Six Thinking Hats
- Bewertung
- 3,75 von 5 Sternen
- Beschreibung
- The internationally bestselling guide to better thinking used by tens of thousands of people - fully revised and updated. The need for the Six Hats is based on an understanding of how the brain chemicals change with the mode of thinking. Using this method one major corporation reduced the time taken for multinational project discussions from thirty days to just two days. Argument is inefficient, ineffective and extremely slow. Argument was never designed to be constructive. The parallel thinking of the six hats is rapidly replacing argument around the world. For two-thousand-four-hundred years we have been content with argument which was never designed to be constructive. Discovering 'what is' may not be the same as designing 'what can be'.